19 Nov

Beatrice has lived her entire life as a part of the Abnegation faction of her city (a ruined dystopia which was formerly Chicago).  Abnegation values thinking of others before the self, and everything is about forgetting selfish needs and desires.  The other four factions are Candor (the honest), Dauntless (the brave), Amity (the peaceful), and Erudite (the intelligent). Beatrice longs to escape the confines of selfless living, and she knows on her sixteenth birthday she will be able to choose another faction.  The only problem is that if she chooses to leave Abnegation she can never come back, and she will almost never see her family again. The day comes for her to choose between staying with her family and being true to herself, and her choice leads her to a competitive and grueling initiation where she must figure out who her friends are and keep the truth about herself a secret.

The Hype

Nora: So Divergent is hyped as the next Hunger Games, and for the most part I thought it lived up to the buzz.  It isn’t as powerful or resonating as Hunger Games, but it is almost as exciting.  

Em: I think this new series has great potential, but I’m not sure if it will rival The Hunger Games for me (which is ok, not all books have to be that good). The big difference between the two first installments of these two dystopian YA series is that Divergent felt more like a set up for the series than a solid book in itself, whereas The Hunger Games could stand alone without the next two books. So much of Divergent was focused on initiation and it wasn’t until the very end that we get deep into the conflict. It is a great lead up to the second book, but I guess I wish it was a great lead up to the middle of the first book instead.  

That being said, Roth did a great job of creating characters and conflict that I want to see further developed in Insurgent (the next book in the series). And I enjoyed the world-building even though I didn’t buy the premise. I still want to learn more about how this society works (or doesn’t work) and what the world outside of the city is like. I’m also hopeful that Roth won’t turn the series into a love-centered storyline – I loved The Hunger Games, but once it became all Team Gale vs. Team Peeta, I kind of gagged a little. 

Nora: I agree that the love triangle part of The Hunger Games is one of the weaker parts of the story. I do think that it will work better in the movie…sometimes I need a visual to get the story. With Divergent I actually like the romance element. I think the boys are way more interesting than Peeta and Gale.


Em: Tris (Beatrice) is a solid protagonist. She’s complex. She has flaws. She’s tough, but not without her soft-side. And I love her relationship with Four – it seems natural and not too soppy – no insta-love here. All the other side characters are pretty fascinating too – from Tris’ parents and brother to friends Christina and Will and of course Peter who could prove to be a favorite character (not in a let’s be friends kind of way). Character development is a real strong point in this series thus far, and I am excited to carry forward with those that made it through book one (yup, Roth can be brutal, and I appreciate that!).

Nora: Beatrice is a little too self-doubting for me. I would like it if she got angrier, and was more complex with her actions and emotions. I also think it is a weakness that the characters can’t really interact with their families after they divide into factions. I just didn’t feel like Roth did a good job justifying why they had to separate completely from their families.

The Sorting Hat

Nora: My favorite thing is the Harry Potter-esque way in which one can sort oneself and their friends into the different houses – sorry I mean faction.  I think I am either Amity or Erudite. I could NEVER be Dauntless – all those paths that lack railings and jumping on and off of moving trains would kill me instantly – my ankle still hurts after spraining it horseback riding six years ago, so there is no way I could make it through combat training and all the other stuff they do. And Abnegation? Well, the details make Abnegation seem like a crazy religious cult where there aren’t any mirrors and people wear gray sack-like outfits. Not for me. 

Em: We can be faction roomies! If I had to choose a faction, I’d either go Amity or Erudite (though I think factions are stupid). But I’m definitely Divergent. When I take those Myers-Briggs style tests, I’m always split down the middle on the various traits. But Myers-Briggs says I’m an ideal teacher, so I guess I should go Erudite and then secretly be true to my Divergent self.

Nora: Let’s go for Erudite. We can just be nice on the side when we feel like it, but it won’t be a constant requirement.

Final Words

Em: While the story is at times reminiscent of previous dystopian novels (The Giver and The Hunger Games in particular), the writing, character development, and overall action make Divergent stand out. This is an impressive debut from Veronica Roth with great potential for being an exciting series. I will definitely pick up Insurgent and highly suggest that you give Divergent a try, if you haven’t already. 

Nora: I agree. I think it is worth reading, and is for the most part exciting and engaging. I wish more boundaries were being pushed though.

Em’s rating: 4 out of 5 stars
Nora’s rating: 4 out of 5 stars
Author: Veronica Roth
Publisher: HarperTeen (May 2011)

Note: ARCs received from April at Good Books and Good Wine and from publisher for honest review.

6 Responses to “Divergent”

  1. Meredith 19. Nov, 2011 at 12:19 pm #

    I really like the dual Em and Nora review. It’s a lot of fun. I’ve had “Divergent” on my TBR for awhile now. I know I have to get to it one of these days.

  2. capillya 22. Nov, 2011 at 10:20 pm #

    I like the dual review too! Also I think I’m the last person in bloggerdom to read this book. Seriously. I mean, besides me and Meredith.

  3. Em 23. Nov, 2011 at 9:24 am #

    It may not be so bad reading it late in the game – that way you’re closer to the release of Insurgent. Glad you like the dual review!

  4. Miss Anderson 04. Dec, 2011 at 4:29 pm #

    I love this review! I’ve seen so many love/hate reviews, but you guys seemed to feel like I did about it. It wasn’t as good a Hunger Games, but I don’t expect that from a good book. I think you hit the nail on the head about where it felt short: it is so so obviously the first book in a trilogy. I’ve been having a hard time with YA dystopia lately because of this trilogy stuff (Delirium, Match, Divergent, etc). Sometimes I don’t want to wait three years before I get a satisfying ending!

  5. Nancy 17. May, 2013 at 2:53 pm #

    I’m late to the party. I just read Divergent. It was a little too imitative of Hunger Games for my taste. I also had a problem with eighteen year olds like Eric and Four being the leaders of the Dauntless faction. Did the older adults die jumping on and off trains? A few times Tris talks about Eric as an older man. What sixteen year old girl thinks an 18 year old is too old for her? I was also distracted by the grammatical errors. Why didn’t an editor clean that up? That said, I was hooked on the book. I love those dystopian novels. I’m Amity and Erudite divergent myself. Em–I was divergent on Myer-Briggs as well on a couple of the categories.

Trackbacks and Pingbacks

  1. 2011 Was A Very Bookish Year | Love YA Lit - 31. Dec, 2011

    […] by Blythe Woolston Bleeding Violet by Dia Reeves Huntress by Malinda Lo Level Up by Gene Luen Yang Divergent by Veronica Roth Don’t Stop Now by Julie Halpern Trapped by Michael Northrop Ten Things We […]

Leave a Reply